<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Minitest on DO GEESE SEE GOD</title>
		<link>https://skapande.org/tags/minitest/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Minitest on DO GEESE SEE GOD</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:28:20 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://skapande.org/tags/minitest/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Xdotool_wmctrl</title>
				<link>https://skapande.org/code/xdotool_wmctrl/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:28:20 +0200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://skapande.org/code/xdotool_wmctrl/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Testing things sometimes gives you insights.. like when minitesting my Ruby module &lt;code&gt;Xdo&lt;/code&gt;. I found that different kinds of windows positioned differently.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Turns out that &lt;code&gt;xdotool windowmove&lt;/code&gt; has inconsistencies, using &amp;lsquo;outer&amp;rsquo; size (including decorations) and treating SSD-windows and CSD-windows differently.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The soulution was &lt;code&gt;wmctrl -e gravity 10&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I never had such a &amp;ldquo;visual&amp;rdquo; minitest.. where windows where moved around and checked using &lt;code&gt;xwininfo&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
